Can several Australian offices share the allocation?

They can contribute through an agreed request queue and one person responsible for priorities. Include the relevant office and reviewer on each task. If two offices need conflicting changes, your team needs to resolve that conflict before the developer can implement a useful result.

For Australian teams

Dedicated capacity for Australian delivery teams

Bring us the work your Australian team expects to tackle each month. We can discuss a continuing development role, how it fits your team and the review time you will need to keep work moving.

Let’s talk

Give the workstream enough structure to move

A professional speaking on a laptop video call at a desk. — Illustrative photography · LinkedIn Sales Solutions / Unsplash

Dedicated development capacity can suit Australian teams with a continuing backlog of website or application work. You may have enough work to keep a contributor involved, but need to decide what you want them to take on: implementing well-defined changes, investigating problems or helping shape requirements.

We start with the stack and a few representative tasks. Show us a routine change, a more involved piece of work and the kinds of requests that interrupt the plan. That gives us a better basis for discussing the role than an hours estimate alone. It also helps establish which product decisions and technical reviews your team will continue to handle.

Plan the asynchronous cycle

Work needs to remain understandable when the person who wrote the request is offline. Before a task starts, we agree where its requirements, questions and progress will live. If a missing answer blocks work, the note should say what is needed and whether another task can proceed.

Your product owner or agency lead sets priorities and resolves conflicting requests. Together, we agree when your team can review completed changes. Written notes cover what changed, the checks performed and any outstanding question, so a meeting can concentrate on a difficult decision rather than reconstructing the task.

Define capacity and availability honestly

The arrangement specifies committed capacity, how interruptions affect it and any non-working periods. We discuss practical overlap for your team’s actual Australian location. Local business-hours coverage, operational support and urgent response need their own scope; a continuing development role does not establish those commitments by itself.

Access also needs to match the work. We agree repository access, coding standards, test data and deployment permissions before relying on them for delivery. Your organisation should be able to use the code and documentation throughout the engagement and when the role changes or ends.

Assess the relationship periodically

Look at the work together: which changes moved through smoothly, which needed repeated clarification and which waited for review? Those observations help us adjust the role, the task descriptions or the time your team sets aside to respond.

If the work is mostly a fixed set of agency projects, white-label delivery may fit better. If the application’s condition is unknown, begin with a PHP review. To discuss continuing capacity, share your likely workload and desired start.

Prepare a role brief rather than a resource request

A useful brief describes what the contributor will actually do. Include the stack, examples of expected tasks and how much definition those tasks already have. Say whether you need implementation, analysis, testing or coordination, and which responsibilities stay with your team.

For example, “improve our customer portal” leaves several possible roles open. “Implement agreed portal changes from our prioritised tickets, with our team reviewing business rules and releases” describes a much clearer starting point. If you also need help deciding what the portal should do, include that in the discussion.

Tell us who can answer business questions, who reviews code and who can approve a release. These may be different people. Include known absences or review constraints so we can plan how work will move between your team and ours.

Run a reviewable capacity cycle

Choose the next tasks from the agreed priorities, raise questions where they arise and return changes with enough context for review. The reviewer should be able to find the relevant code or preview, understand the intended behaviour and see what has been checked. Any unfinished part needs to be clear before the next task obscures it.

For example, a store change might need operations staff to check how an order appears, while a template change needs a design reviewer to check the layout. A developer can explain the implementation and checks; your team still needs the right person to judge whether the change works for the business. Agreeing that person at the start avoids a finished change waiting in the wrong queue.

Reassess the model when the backlog changes

A role that began with planned improvements can become difficult to use if urgent requests continually displace them. Review the pattern together. You may need to change priorities, define a project around a stable outcome or discuss separately planned incident support.

Keep code and operating notes in the agreed repositories and documentation as work progresses. When the role changes, update its responsibilities and commercial terms too. An urgent message should not be the only place a new responsibility is discussed.

Keep the backlog ready for the agreed review window

Before an item reaches the top of the queue, check that it explains why the change matters, what access or examples are needed and how your team will judge the result. A screenshot with the current behaviour and a short description of the expected behaviour can be more useful than a long, ambiguous request.

Name someone who can answer questions and someone who can review the result. If the next item is still unclear, make that visible early enough to discuss other work. Allocated hours do not translate into a guaranteed number of features: the complexity of the tasks, interruptions and time spent waiting all affect what can be completed.

Compare the regional delivery routes · Discuss this delivery requirement.

Questions about Australian capacity planning

A few useful answers before you decide.

Does dedicated capacity include weekend or local-hours incident cover?

Only if we expressly agree that coverage and can support it. Tell us what incidents you need covered and when. Development allocation, meeting overlap and incident response are separate commitments, so required coverage needs to be settled before the engagement begins.

How do we keep completed tasks from waiting indefinitely for review?

Choose a reviewer for each type of work and agree when they can respond, including a plan for absences. We provide the change details, checks and questions they need. If reviews start to accumulate, your lead needs to make time for them alongside new requests; otherwise completed changes can hold up the next work.

How should we describe expected monthly work?

Send representative tasks, likely volume and the responsibilities involved. Include recurring interruptions and the time your team can give to questions and reviews. A month of defined page changes asks something different from a month of investigating unclear application behaviour, even if the proposed hours are the same.

What happens when our team supplies no ready tasks?

The agreement should explain how waiting and unused allocation are treated. We flag a gap in the queue and discuss other useful work within scope. Whether unused capacity rolls forward is a term to agree, rather than something to assume when the backlog runs short.

Can the developer take over product decisions?

That can only form part of the role if it is explicitly scoped and appropriate. Your business still needs someone responsible for priorities and business rules. If you need help shaping requirements as well as implementing them, raise that when we discuss the role so the expected work is clear.

How do we avoid losing context between working periods?

Keep questions, answers and change notes with the task, including what needs to happen next and who will do it. After a meeting, add any decision that affects the work there too. Someone returning to the task should be able to continue without needing to track down a private conversation.

How should we end or change the role?

Follow the commercial agreement for notice, access and outstanding work. Keep documentation current during delivery, then identify unfinished tasks, their status and any permissions that need to change. Maintaining this information as we work makes a transition easier to organise.

Keep exploring

Keep the right things connected.

For Australian teams

Start a conversation

Tell us what you are working towards. We’ll help you find a practical next step.